| Rev Diabet Stud, 2004, 1(2):89-94 | DOI 10.1900/RDS.2004.1.89 |
Ken Yajima1,2, Akira Shimada1, Hiroshi Hirose1, Akira Kasuga3, Takao Saruta1
1Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan.Keywords: metformin, acarbose, type 2 diabetes, cross-over trial
OBJECTIVES: "High dose" metformin therapy (2,550 mg/day) is reported to improve glycemic control in type 2 diabetic patients with obesity (body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30). Some have reported that metformin therapy, even in low doses (500-750 mg/day), improves glycemic control in non-obese type 2 diabetic patients (BMI approximately 25). However, it is unclear whether "low dose" metformin improves glycemic control better than acarbose in non-obese type 2 diabetic patients, which has been shown to improve glycemic control in type 2 diabetes with obesity. METHODS: We randomly divided 22 non-obese type 2 diabetic patients (mean BMI approximately 25) into two groups (A = 11, B = 11). Group A was treated with "low dose" metformin (500-750 mg/day) for 3 months, and switched to acarbose (150-300 mg/day) for another 3 months. Group B was treated with acarbose first, and then switched to "low dose" metformin. RESULTS: "Low dose" metformin significantly decreased the fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and HbA1c level in both groups A and B, whereas acarbose decreased HbA1c levels in group B but not in group A. Overall, "low dose" metformin significantly decreased HbA1c (p=0.0165) levels as compared to acarbose. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, "low dose" metformin therapy improved glycemic control better than acarbose in non-obese diabetics.
Fulltext:
HTML ,
PDF
(244KB)
|
Long-term effect of metformin on blood glucose control in non-obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
Ito H, Ishida H, Takeuchi Y, Antoku S, Abe M, Mifune M, Togane M Nutr Metab (Lond) 2010. 7:83 |
|
Effects of Metformin on QT and QTc Interval Dispersion of Diabetic Rats
da Silva Costa EC, Goncalves AA, Areas MA, Morgabel RG Arq Bras Cardiol 2008. 90(4):232-238 |